Can Failed Startups Protect Employee Data From Cyber Threats?

January 17, 2025

The collapse of a startup is a tumultuous event, often leaving a trail of unresolved issues. Among these, a significant and emerging risk is the potential for employee personal data to be stolen. This article delves into this critical issue, highlighting the findings of Dylan Ayrey, co-founder and CEO of Truffle Security, and the vulnerabilities within Google’s OAuth system.

The Vulnerability in Google’s OAuth System

The “Sign in with Google” Feature

One of the central findings presented by Ayrey is the vulnerability rooted in Google’s OAuth system, specifically the “Sign in with Google” feature. This system allows users to log in to various applications using their Google credentials. Ayrey’s research unveiled a critical security flaw: if malicious actors acquire the defunct domains of failed startups, they can exploit these domains to gain unauthorized access to cloud-based software applications that were configured to allow seamless access to all company employees. This scenario becomes particularly dangerous when considering the extensive reliance startups have on Google’s suite of applications and cloud-based tools.

These tools, integral to a startup’s operational architecture, encompass everything from email communication to project management software. When a startup fails, these digital assets, specifically the domains associated with employee email addresses, often remain inadequately secured. Malicious actors, by taking control of these defunct domains, can effectively masquerade as legitimate users, leveraging their Google credentials to infiltrate an array of cloud platforms. These could include, but are not limited to, project management software, team communication tools like Slack or Zoom, and even more sensitive applications such as HR systems. The ramifications of this kind of unauthorized access can be severe, leading potentially to significant personal data breaches.

Exploiting Defunct Domains

The exploitation of defunct domains mostly threatens startups, which primarily manage their operations through Google’s suite of applications and various cloud software tools. When a company collapses, it often leaves behind its digital assets, including domains used for email and software logins, in a vulnerable state. Hackers who seize control of these domains can impersonate former employees and use their Google logins to breach multiple cloud platforms. These platforms can range from team communication tools like Slack and Zoom to more sensitive systems like HR software, containing critical personal information such as Social Security numbers and banking details.

The domination of these domains extends beyond mere access to communication tools; they grant an open gateway to a goldmine of personal data stored in HR systems or even CRM tools. Ayrey’s investigation revealed that such access allows hackers to harvest a veritable treasure trove of sensitive information. As startups are often ill-prepared to manage the digital fallout of their collapse, the digital remnants they leave behind become easy pickings for cybercriminals. Their ability to pose as former employees and seamlessly integrate into the cloud-based ecosystem of the collapsed enterprise exacerbates the risk further, putting the personal data of countless former employees at stake.

Demonstrating the Risk

Practical Demonstration by Ayrey

Ayrey demonstrated this vulnerability in a practical setting by purchasing a defunct startup’s domain and subsequently accessing critical applications such as ChatGPT, Notion, Zoom, Slack, and an HR system containing sensitive info. He managed to leverage access to these platforms, exposing the sheer volume of personal data that could be harvested from them. From these platforms, he could glean a wealth of personal information about former employees, underscoring the severity of this security risk. Ayrey’s demonstration highlighted a particularly glaring vulnerability in these commonly used applications.

By accessing the HR system, Ayrey could potentially view Social Security numbers, banking details, and other highly confidential personal data. His experiment underscored the vulnerability posed by lax offboarding protocols and emphasized the urgent need for startups to secure their digital assets upon shutting down. By demonstrating practical, real-world exploitation of the vulnerability, Ayrey brought to the fore the lurking threats conquering defunct domain spaces pose. The stakes for former employees cannot be overstated, as unauthorized access to these systems can lead to identity theft, financial fraud, and several other potential damages.

The Role of Sub-Identifiers

While Google provides a countermeasure in the form of a “sub-identifier” within its OAuth configuration, which is essentially a unique string of numbers linked to each Google account, Ayrey’s collaboration with an affected SaaS HR provider suggested this measure is not foolproof. The sub-identifier is designed to ensure that even if email addresses are replicated through control of a domain, the identity verification process remains secure due to the unique identifier. Ayrey and his team, however, discovered that this identifier was inconsistent in a minuscule percentage of cases—0.04%—leading to hundreds of failed logins each week for the HR provider, which discouraged the utilization of this security feature.

The inconsistencies in the sub-identifier’s reliability present a significant challenge, especially when the stakes involve potentially sensitive personal data. While 0.04% may appear negligible at face value, it’s substantial when extrapolated to the volume of requests attempting to access cloud services on a weekly basis. These inconsistencies could lead to a plethora of failed logins, frustrating legitimate usage and increasing the risk quotient for identity management within the cloud ecosystem. Ayrey’s findings about sub-identifier irregularities prompt a call to action for more robust, fail-safe identity verification mechanisms in cloud services reliant on OAuth protocols.

Google’s Response and Re-evaluation

Discrepancy and Re-evaluation

Google disputes the assertion that sub-identifiers are unreliable, maintaining that they should not change. This discrepancy between Ayrey’s findings and Google’s stance has attracted significant attention within the cybersecurity community. Initially, Google dismissed Ayrey’s report as a fraud issue rather than a security bug. However, after further examination and community pressure, Google reopened the ticket. They awarded Ayrey a bounty, thereby acknowledging the potential risk highlighted by his thorough research. This incident underscores the complexity and evolving nature of cybersecurity, particularly concerning widely adopted technologies like OAuth.

Google’s re-evaluation acknowledges the gravity of the situation, reflecting a broader movement within the tech industry toward accepting community-driven research as a catalyst for security improvement. Ayrey’s case highlights the importance of collaborative efforts between cybersecurity professionals and tech giants in identifying and mitigating risks. The initial dismissal of the findings as merely a fraud issue rather than a potential security flaw also indicates ongoing challenges in how security risks are categorized and addressed. This situation underscores the necessity for critical scrutiny and a rethinking of current security procedures to adequately safeguard personal data in cloud-based environments.

Updated Documentation and Recommendations

In response to this vulnerability, Google has updated its documentation to encourage cloud providers to use sub-identifiers more effectively and offer guidance to founders on how to shut down Google Workspace properly. The updated guidelines aim to equip startups with the necessary knowledge and steps to securely close their digital operations, thereby mitigating risks associated with domain exploitation. Despite these efforts, a technical fix specifically addressing the inconsistencies in sub-identifier usage has yet to be implemented, indicating an ongoing challenge in balancing robust security measures with practical usability for a diverse range of users.

Google’s updated documentation represents a proactive step toward better security practices, but it also underscores the inherent tension between usability and security. Encouraging the effective use of sub-identifiers is a critical measure, yet the absence of a specific technical fix leaves room for potential vulnerabilities. This reflects a broader trend in the tech world where solutions must balance the need for rigorous security against the imperative of user-friendliness. Google’s actions indicate a commitment to improving cloud security, but the industry remains vigilant and in search of more definitive solutions to these pervasive issues.

The Broader Implications for Startups

The Need for Rigorous Offboarding Protocols

The vulnerabilities exposed by Ayrey’s research reflect a broader concern within the tech and cybersecurity fields about the adequacy of existing measures to protect personal data, especially during transitional phases such as company shutdowns. The underlying consensus is unequivocal: startups and tech companies need to enforce rigorous offboarding protocols that include properly closing and securing all cloud services to prevent unauthorized access. This involves more than just deactivating accounts; it requires ensuring that digital assets are properly managed and that domain controls are locked down to prevent exploitation.

Startup organizations, often in the throes of financial and operational distress during closure, might overlook the critical phase of securely offboarding their digital presence. Comprehensive guidelines and automated tools specific to these needs can bridge the gap, ensuring that even in distressed situations, key security protocols are followed scrupulously. By integrating robust offboarding protocols into the lifecycle management of their digital assets, startups can mitigate the risk of data breaches, thereby protecting the personal data of their former employees. The enforcement of these protocols must be rigorous, leaving no room for oversight, thereby ensuring a secure transition at the end of the company’s lifecycle.

Emotional and Logistical Hurdles

The collapse of a startup is a chaotic and challenging event, often leaving behind numerous unresolved issues. Among these, a particularly significant and growing concern is the risk of employee personal data being stolen. Startups, in their rush to innovate and grow, might overlook robust security measures, leading to potential data breaches when the company folds. This article explores this critical topic, emphasizing the insights of Dylan Ayrey, co-founder and CEO of Truffle Security. Ayrey sheds light on the vulnerabilities within Google’s OAuth system, a common authentication mechanism used by many startups. These vulnerabilities can be exploited, posing a significant threat to the personal data of employees. Understanding and addressing these risks are essential for startups to protect their employees’ information and prevent future breaches. The findings underscore the importance of implementing strong security protocols and remaining vigilant even as a startup faces its demise.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later